Friday, January 27, 2012

Abortion is worse than Sharia Law

                As I have been reading news reports about “The March for Life 2012” I notice things.  Such as the Washington Post never has a long shot of the crowd.  They have about ten pictures two of which are of the pro-abortion counter-protesters and four of which were protesters engaging with the pro-abortion activists.  All of the pictures are tight on the face and two just of a hand holding rosary beads.  So the impact is that an undeterminable amount of people were at the march, so multiple comments claim that there were only about 200, tens of thousands in fact, and there were an indeterminate amount of counter- marchers, probably also 200 or more, 11 in fact.  When one sees pictures which normal people take of a march what one sees is an ocean of humanity.  I also read the comments pages because it matters to me how people process information.  A comment I read among the hundreds is that we are heading for Christian Sharia Law.  In Sharia Law if one is caught stealing that person’s hand is cut off, it being the vehicle of the offence and thus its absence would also cause the community to be aware of the person as a past offender.  In abortion law if two people have sex and a pregnancy results a baby is broken and sliced into pieces, a baby is a logical outcome of the sexual act and the couple wishing to hide themselves from the logical outcomes of their sexual act.  Abortion is far worse than Sharia Law.
                Only if a person were picked at random and made to answer for two person’s indiscretions could a practice be more unfair.  This is simply allowing a member of your family to be killed for those very indiscretions.  Abortion is more like the tyrant one would criticize in Iran, or the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein, or the civil rights record of any tyrant really.  The real difference is efficiency it would be hard to imagine 40 million or 50 million human beings destroyed by a despotic regime, it is estimated that 11 million people died in the Nazi concentration camps of those 6 million were Jews.  Joseph Stalin starved 7 million people to death in the Ukraine.  The Khmer Rouge in Cambodia murdered 2 million people.   400,000 people were killed in the Darfur genocide.  200,000 people died in the Bosnian genocide.
                The objection to these comparisons to our abortion epidemic of these United States is of course that babies in a mother’s womb are not babies.  A comment which I read yesterday illustrates this point stating that a fetus was actually a parasite, chemically masking itself from being attacked by the mother’s immune system and compromising a woman’s bodily integrity.
                The obvious problem with this argument is that having babies is natural.  A baby is not a parasite; even the author of such calumny was once a “parasitic” fetus.  If a baby is at the top of a woman’s bodily pecking order this is a totally natural occurrence.  Thus nature has made it so and thank God it has as there could be no humanity sans such measures.
 A woman’s body even colludes with these “parasites” as it monthly makes itself ready for just such an occupation; making the perfect environment for the invasion.  The womb is a perpetual turncoat pining to host a “parasite”; making things just so.  “Your body your choice” it guffaws waiting for its chance to aid the resistance.  Every female member of NARAL and Planned Parenthood, of a certain age of course, has this internal disconnect between the head, the heart, and the body, and particularly their uterus and ovaries issuing their monthly propaganda.
What adds insult to injury is that do to microchimerism having babies is incredibly beneficial to a woman’s health.  Microchimerism is a process by which mothers and babies share cells across the placenta in utero.  What this provides a mother is cell therapy for many decades after she has given birth, even though the mother’s immune system should have cleared these cells out in a matter of hours.
Dr. Kirby Johnson of Tufts Medical Center, Boston, relayed a story to illustrate these phenomena to NPR’s Robert Krulwich.  A woman had been admitted to a Boston hospital with symptoms of hepatitis.  She was an intravenous drug user who had five recorded pregnancies: one live birth, two miscarriages, and two abortions.  Johnson took a liver biopsy of her as a part of his examination and found after reviewing the lab results hundreds of fetal cells, “literally sheets of cells, whole areas which seemed to be normal.”
In conclusion, Christian Sharia law is not on the horizon, the abortion law in place now is far more illogical and backwards than Sharia law.  A fetus is a baby in a particular stage of development and not a parasite.  Pregnancy is not simply a woman’s burden but also a very real blessing and last, but certainly not least, one must read or watch the news with an eye for distortion and be willing to share the truth on comment boards.  Now put your hands upon your keyboard we break on three; one, two, three, break!
               

10 comments:

  1. THIS IS SCIENCE:
    FETUS IS NOT A BABY (GOOGLE THE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CHART), but a parasite because the classification of the biological relationship that is based on the behavior one organism (fetus) and how it relates to the woman's body.

    as a zygote, it invaded the woman's uterus using its TROPHOBLAST cells, hijacked her immune system by using NEUROKININ B and HCG--- so her body doesn't kill it, steals her nutrients to survive, and causes her harm or potential death.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trophoblast

    "The placenta functions as an immunological barrier between the mother and the fetus, creating an immunologically privileged site. For this purpose, it uses several mechanisms:
    It secretes Neurokinin B containing phosphocholine molecules. This is the same mechanism used by parasitic nematodes to avoid detection by the immune system of their host.[2]"
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immune_tolerance_in_pregnancy

    "Progesterone enriches the uterus with a thick lining of blood vessels and capillaries so that it can sustain the growing fetus. Due to its highly-negative charge, hCG may repel the immune cells of the mother, protecting the fetus during the first trimester. It has also been hypothesized that hCG may be a placental link for the development of local maternal immunotolerance."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_chorionic_gonadotropin

    "It is also possible for a symbiotic relationship to exist between two organisms of the same species."
    http://www.answers.com/topic/symbiosis -- Gale's Science of Everyday Things.

    just like a parasitic twin --- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parasitic_twin

    "an animal or plant that lives in or on another (the host) from which it obtains nourishment. The host does not benefit from the association and is often harmed by it"
    http://www.thefreedictionary.com/parasite

    pregnancy CAUSES HARM: http://www.thelizlibrary.org/liz/004.htm


    since a man can kill his tapeworm at anytime– so should a woman abort unwanted, human-parasitic fetus, too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. THIS IS THE LAW:
    ABORTION IS A CIVIL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT SUPPORTED BY THE RIGHTS TO PRIVACY, THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT, AND THE 13TH AMENDMENT.

    NO HUMAN ( that means the FETUS, too) has a right to life or any due process rights by the 14th amendment to use another human's body or body parts AGAINST their will, civil and constitutional rights: that's why you are not forced to donate your kidney---the human fetus is no exception; this is supported by the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment AND 13th amendment, which makes reproductive slavery unconstitutional.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause

    "Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. "

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

    this makes viability unconstitutional because pregnancy is not a crime.

    consensual sex=/= a legal, binding contract to an unwanted fetus to live; and abortion is not murder, the unlawful killing with intent.

    ReplyDelete
  3. THE BIBLE:
    the bible supported abortion, that was done by a priest, in god's name, in his holly temple!
    the 1984 NIV footnote of numbers 5:11-31 explained what "to thy thigh to rot, they belly to swell" meant: numbers 5:21 "or causes you to have a miscarrying womb and barrenness" to CAUSE a miscarrying womb IS an abortion.


    'Ephraim, as I saw Tyre, is planted in a pleasant place; but Ephraim shall bring forth his children to the murderer." Give them, O LORD -- what wilt Thou give? Give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts...Ephraim is smitten, their root is dried up, they shall bear no fruit; yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb.'

    HOSEA 9-16

    the judeo-christian god is a myth and historical evidence proves it.
    3.3.3 ATHEISM: A HISTORY OF GOD (Part 1)

    http://www.evilbible.com/god
    http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/abortion.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. tehsunshine:

    The phenomenon described in this nontechnical and highly biased article is called microchimerism and has not been documented extensively in humans. To date, the only extensive research into microchimerism has been performed in mice, which leads to zero conclusions about its function or even presence in humans. And if all the claims in this “article” are correct, a fetus still maintains a parasitic relationship with the pregnant person because it cannot survive without leeching off the host, and the host receives no appreciable benefit from the relationship (especially not any benefit that overrides the harmful effects of pregnancy)

    This is also not breaking news. Biologists have known about microchimerism for years; however, there is very little evidence to suggest that pregnancy is beneficial in humans. Additionally, there is some (but again, little) evidence that suggests that the microchimeric state is harmful to the pregnant person.

    Pregnancy is dangerous by its own right- almost half of all pregnant people in the U.S. experience maternal* morbidity. When you add in the exchange of cells between potentially incompatible organisms, the potential for harm to the pregnant person grows higher.

    This “article” is offensive on multiple levels: for one, it is a tool for the anti-choice movement to erase the experiences of pregnancy. “Oh look, some stray cells MIGHT find their way to the right organ and MIGHT help you ward off heart disease or cancer. Maybe. That totally makes up for nine months of gestation, labor, and childbirth, right?”

    It is also offensive in the way that all anti-choice propaganda is offensive: it fails to recognize that fetuses do not have special rights that allow them to hijack another person’s body. Until the anti-choice movement attempts to make living organ donation mandatory, they don’t have a leg to stand on.



    http://murphysbride.tumblr.com/post/15334144623/unborn-child-just-a-parasite-cutting-edge-science

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh wow! It was you! You were disseminating this propaganda on the board in question and they took it down! Will I take it down? No, because I reference you specifically! An embryo doesn't have "special rights"? What about natural law? What about logic? Unless that embryo sought to place itself within the womb there is a logical progression of events which occur. To call that activity "parasitic" is paradoxical at best. So one must have been swimming without a swimsuit in sperm infested waters, short of that... not buying it. Citing the processes of biology is not a defense against that biology. One must create the malice of intent in one's own mind.
    Speaking of malice of intent, I forgive you for trying to cherry pick Scripture. It's a common mistake taken by Christian and non-Christian alike. The verse you speak of is a remedy for bitterness not an abortion. I dare you to take that rubrict to any OBGYN and ask them if that would successfully abort a fetus. It may however cause peace and forgiveness but never an abortion.
    It was the law of our country that slaves could be owned. (Yawn) yadda, yadda. Laws change stop being such a concrete thinker.
    Before you level that charge back at me I was an atheist from the age of 15 to the age of 32. So I have held your views. I just stopped thinking so concretely and sought the logical truth.
    I am praying for you and do wish you the best.
    It's a sort of honor to have you find my little blog.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, a fan -- oh, how I love the little people.

      hehehehe.

      what board are talking about, child?

      There are a lot of weak-minded people who will take down/delete/destroy/disguise the science that offends their little fragile sensibilities, WHILE they can't prove it wrong... it's called censorship --- but, don't worry I have something BIG in mind. Now, to deal with your appeal to emotional diatribe, unless you can prove the science of the human fetus being a parasite, wrong -- STFU; I have no malice against your religious MYTH, I have malcontent for people like you who want to force your beliefs on others, at the same time want to get B*TCHY --when atheists like me, say "prove your myths are real" ---you can't have it both ways.

      I didn't cherry pick, I quoted two verses from the bible that proves your myth has no problems with abortions -- since one of the verse supported feticide, and other I even provide a footnote-- which you ignored.

      I suggest you learn the difference between cherry picking and quoting -- since it's against the well known pro-life-schizophrenic-fascism's ideology: GOD is pro-life -- when the bible proves the opposite.

      Duh, laws change -- but, the constitutional isn't normal law.... what pro-life-schizophrenic-fascists like you ALWAYS forgot/ignored is: RATIFICATION. You can't change the constitution at the drop of a hat -- if you actually looked at the constitution, you will find: viability IS unconstitutional because pregnancy is not a crime, thus there is no need for due process and NO HUMAN has a right at life at the expense of another HUMAN -- including the fetus.

      Look, I don't care about your "mein kampf", I really don't ... so keep it to yourself, please.

      Even though I'm not strong in biology at all -- what you willingly failed to realize is: microchimerism doesn't disprove the human fetus being a parasite according to SYMBIOSIS (a different field) --- sorry, it doesn't.

      SO YOU LOST: IN SCIENCE, LAW AND THE BIBLE -- thus I will continue parroting "the same small scope of ideas and websites, which makes me seem like a bit of a one trick pony -- even though the readily available science proves I'm right (seriously just Google the name)."


      P.S people like you, tried to censor Galileo once because he spoke the truth and when he wouldn't back down, you guys tried to kill him for it--- I wonder what you pro-life-schizophrenic-fascists will try to do to me.

      Delete
  6. Although it reveal a sort of myopic almost OCD fanatisism that would make some Christians jealous. Although you continually restate and parrot the same small scope of ideas and websites which make you seem like a bit of a one trick pony, seriously just Google the name. I have not begun to site anything yet. I left Chesterton, I just love him, and the Church's stance, well documented and in writting, on abortion since the first Century out, but it's coming if you so desire.

    ReplyDelete
  7. One more thing, sorry it is my blog, microchimerism has been studied in humans since 1979 when researchers at Stanford University found Y chromosomes in a pregnant mother's blood. The study includes biology, reproductive genetics, and epigenetics and has found that by the end of a mother's pregnancy up to 6 percent of the DNA in her blood plasma comes from her baby.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Don't flatter yourself. I certainly won't. The Washington Post took down your comment about the parasite tripe, to which someone deftly responded, "If it's a parasite why don't we kill them all!" That is a good question. The Washington Post calls you a hatefull extremist you may want to stop and reevaluate...child.
    I reiterate it is illogical to call the fetus a parasite as it cannot conjure itself into being.
    When people refuse to act in accordance with the laws of nature then we want abortion. You have the right to have sex but you do not have the right to murder another individual. Check the DNA the kid can only ever be half hers. Parasites don't have any of the same DNA as there hosts, they aren't there children!
    Because the person trying to have it both ways is you.
    And yes you are cherry picking the Bible. Which is an odd thing for you to get all defensive about as your knowledge of the bible comes from rather dubious sources, hey you sited them now live with them.
    Polly want a cracker?
    We are made in the image and likeness of God.

    ReplyDelete
  9. We are made in the image and likeness of God, not me not you but all of us. This is where the human person receives it's dignity. Otherwise it maybe taken away by bullies and the survival of the fittest simply means whoever can oppress another and impose himself.
    It has taken 39 years for the pro-life movement to get this far, so any fear mongering is a little out of pitch with reality. Things are changing as the youth realize that their very lives were not a foregone conclusion. They were threatened at their most vulnerable state, in there mother's womb. I know you can't hear this right now and I am praying for you- honestly. We are still a representative government and I take heart that the rising tide will happen regardless of what we say hear and maybe even inspite of it. The survivors of Roe v. Wade are growing up and we are history in the making. So are we all as our lives are but a whisper no matter how much we muddy up the internet.

    ReplyDelete